Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Supreme Court issued a ruling on April 29 curtailing a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The April 29 Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for last-minute redistricting pushes in states such as Louisiana and Tennessee.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
A constitutional amendment proposal must be approved by at least two-thirds of the House and Senate.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
A constitutional amendment proposal must be ratified by at least 38 states.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Congress cast 362 votes in 2025.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 362 votes cast by Congress in 2025 were the second-lowest count in the last quarter century.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 118th Congress served from Jan. 3, 2023, to Jan. 3, 2025.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
The 118th Congress enacted 274 laws.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Supreme Court decided Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court held that Dred Scott was not free.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not and could not be citizens.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court held that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Congress passed the 13th Amendment while the Civil War was ongoing.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 13th Amendment outlawed slavery in the United States.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The 13th Amendment was ratified by December 1865.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Confederate General Robert E. Lee admitted defeat in April 1865.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Congress passed the 14th Amendment in 1866.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 14th Amendment bars states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 14th Amendment bars states from denying equal protection of the laws to any person.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The 14th Amendment became part of the Constitution in July 1868.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act was a response to the Supreme Court's 1990 ruling in Employment Division v. Smith.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Employment Division v. Smith centered on Alfred Smith and Galen Black, who ingested peyote during a Native American Church ceremony.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Alfred Smith and Galen Black were fired from their jobs at a private drug rehabilitation organization for using peyote.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Employment Division of Oregon’s Department of Human Resources denied unemployment benefits to Alfred Smith and Galen Black.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Applicants fired for work-related misconduct were ineligible for unemployment benefits in Oregon.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Alfred Smith and Galen Black sued the Employment Division.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Alfred Smith and Galen Black contended that the First Amendment barred the state from treating their religious practice as misconduct.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Alfred Smith and Galen Black won before the Oregon Court of Appeals.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Alfred Smith and Galen Black won before the Oregon Supreme Court.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Employment Division v. Smith that Oregon had not violated the First Amendment by enforcing its controlled substances law.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion in Employment Division v. Smith.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Oregon's controlled substances law prohibited peyote possession and use.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
In Employment Division v. Smith, the court abandoned the compelling interest test previously used in free exercise cases.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The compelling interest test required the government to show that a law interfering with religious practice served a compelling purpose.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The compelling interest test required the government to show that its purpose could not be achieved through less restrictive means.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
By the summer of 1990, Congress was considering legislation to restore the compelling interest test in free-exercise cases.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act passed with near-unanimous support in 1993.
Lawmakers, Members of Congress
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Lawmakers stated in the text of RFRA that the Smith decision virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Under RFRA, the government is required to show that offering a religious exemption to a challenged policy would undermine its purpose.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Supreme Court decided City of Boerne v. Flores in 1997.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
In City of Boerne v. Flores, the Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act did not apply to state actions.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Supreme Court considered Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. in 2007.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. was a sex discrimination lawsuit over unequal pay for men and women doing the same work.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.