Editorial Standards

Methodology

PureSource coverage is built from individually verified factual claims, synthesized from multiple independent reports of the same event. Every article credits the original, primary source behind a fact — the named person, official statement, agency, document, or dataset — and never attributes a fact to another news outlet. Context stays visible, confidence is explicit, and sourcing is transparent.

How stories are assembled

Each article is assembled from a set of verified fact statements, drawn wherever possible from multiple independent reports of the same event so claims can be cross-checked. Facts are grouped by relevance so readers can distinguish the core claims from supporting context, and each surfaced fact carries its original source where one is identified.

Confidence scoring

Confidence is presented as a visual indicator. Higher confidence reflects stronger source agreement, higher source quality, and clearer attribution in available reporting.

Primary vs supporting facts

Primary facts are the minimum claims needed to understand the event. Supporting facts add context, chronology, or nuance without changing the central story.

Reader expectations

PureSource prioritizes clarity and traceability. We continuously improve extraction logic and editorial review controls as coverage expands.