Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence95%
JBS announced its first foray into Africa in 2024 after signing an agreement with the Nigerian government.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence95%
JBS plans to open at least six slaughterhouses in Nigeria, investing $2.5 billion.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
JBS’s $2.5 billion investment in Nigeria represents nearly half of its broader $6 billion global expansion plans.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
A recent analysis found that JBS’s methane emissions in 2023 exceeded those of Shell and ExxonMobil combined.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence95%
In April 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission allowed JBS to list on the New York Stock Exchange.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence95%
As part of its listing process, JBS reincorporated in the Netherlands.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Dutch law requires companies to meet a “duty of care,” in line with international human rights laws, which encompasses harms caused by planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence95%
In April 2024, Greenpeace International sent a letter to JBS alleging that the company is in violation of Dutch law and that its expansion into Nigeria and elsewhere could cause further climate, environmental and human rights damage.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence95%
The Greenpeace letter, sent on April 30, 2024, represents the first step toward a lawsuit.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence90%
The Greenpeace letter requested details of JBS’s planned Nigeria expansion under a newly passed Dutch law that allows entities to demand specific details on Dutch companies if they intend to sue them.
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence95%
“Greenpeace Netherlands believes JBS holds a special position as one of the most climate polluting and ecosystem damaging meat companies in the world,” the letter said, arguing that JBS “has a duty of care under Dutch law that requires the company to refrain from conduct that violates human rights, in particular the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment and to take reasonable measures to prevent harm to people and the planet.”
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence95%
The Greenpeace letter was sent on April 30, 2024, the day of JBS’s first annual meeting in the Netherlands, held at a hotel near Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
Protesters gathered at JBS’s annual meeting in the Netherlands with a banner reading, “JBS: Keep your bloody business out of Africa.”
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence95%
The Greenpeace letter asked JBS to provide “certain information relating to its impact on people and the planet, as well as the steps it takes to measure and mitigate that impact, whether contained in documents or obtainable through the hearing of witnesses or independent expert reviews.”
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence95%
In its response dated May 21, 2024, JBS declined to provide the information requested by Greenpeace and said the company “complies with laws and regulations and believes it is well positioned to support food security in markets around the world. Your letter ignores both the pressing need for food security and the aim for food independence in local markets around the globe, as well as geopolitical dynamics at play.”
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence85%
Opponents, including Nigerian civil society groups, say the lack of transparency from JBS and the Nigerian government means it is unclear how the projects will impact the environment and livelihoods in pastoralist communities.
Richard Brown, Greenpeace International attorney
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence90%
“They’ve been remarkably opaque,” said Richard Brown, a Greenpeace International attorney. “We know that they entered into an agreement 18 months ago and we know that they are planning to invest $2.5 billion in Nigeria and they’ve been talking to people in Nigeria and preparatory work is underway, but the detail is really, really sketchy. They are operating in the shadows.”
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence70%
Some activists believe most of the processed meat from JBS’s Nigeria operations will not end up in Nigeria, but rather be sent to wealthy Middle Eastern countries.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence95%
JBS did not respond to questions from Inside Climate News.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence85%
Greenpeace maintains that the case could establish “a new frontier in the fight against climate change” and if successful “could set a major precedent for future legal challenges against the industrial agriculture sector, which is a major source of methane emissions.”
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
In 2019, the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth, Milieudefensie, sued Netherlands-based Shell to force the company to reduce its emissions in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
A Dutch court ruled in Milieudefensie’s favor in 2021, saying Shell had breached its duty of care under Dutch law.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
The 2021 ruling against Shell was overturned in 2024, but the court maintained the company still had an obligation to reduce emissions.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence85%
The case against JBS is being made on similar legal grounds as the Milieudefensie case against Shell.
Richard Brown, Greenpeace International attorney
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence90%
“The Milieudefensie case made it clear that when you have big-emitting companies, they have a special obligation to reduce emissions,” said Richard Brown, a Greenpeace International attorney. “What is being argued is that JBS is essentially a growth stock—its business model is based on aggressive global expansion—and in order to act in accordance with the Dutch law, as a Dutch company, which is what they now are, they have to have regard in their investment decisions to what that means for a livable planet.”
Alex Wijeratna, attorney with Mighty Earth
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence90%
Alex Wijeratna, an attorney with Mighty Earth, said, “It’s a bridgehead into a growing continent. There’s a lot of food insecurity across the nation, across the continent, so there’s concern. What are the terms of this investment? What analysis have they done? What information have they released into the public domain? What kind of impact will that have on landscapes, deforestation?”
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.