Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
San Francisco immigration court had 21 judges when President Donald Trump was sworn in last year.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence99%
San Francisco immigration court closed on May 1, 2026.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
San Francisco immigration court had only two judges remaining when it closed.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The other judges were fired, retired, or resigned amid a White House purge of federal immigration judges.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
There are no immigrants waiting for rulings or lawyers making arguments at San Francisco immigration court since its closure.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The Executive Office of Immigration Review announced in March that it would close the San Francisco courthouse in 2027 as a cost-saving measure and move its cases to Concord.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
The court closed earlier than planned after nearly all its judges left or were fired.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The Executive Office of Immigration Review decided not to renew the lease for the San Francisco court and said it does not comment on personnel matters.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Most of San Francisco immigration court’s 117,000 immigration cases have been moved to a courthouse in Concord.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Concord is about 30 miles away from San Francisco.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The Concord courthouse opened two years ago to help with San Francisco’s backlog of cases.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The Concord courthouse had 11 judges at the start of 2025 and now has five after a series of firings.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The Concord courthouse had a caseload of 60,000 cases before San Francisco cases were shifted there.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
San Francisco immigration court had the third-highest number of asylum cases in the nation.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
From 2019 to 2024, almost 75% of petitioners received some form of relief at San Francisco immigration court, compared to 43% nationwide.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
San Francisco immigration court had one of the highest rates of legal representation for immigrants in the country due to a network of pro-immigrant organizations and pro bono or low-cost legal services.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence85%
Asylum denial rates have increased under the administration.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Almost 100 immigration judges seen as too liberal have been fired by the administration.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
The administration has approved using hundreds of military lawyers to replace fired judges.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
The immigration court system backlog has reached 3.8 million asylum cases.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Immigrants have been arrested when they arrive at courthouses or government offices for scheduled appearances.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
The two remaining judges from San Francisco immigration court will work from another federal building in the city but be part of an immigration court across the bay.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
The Executive Office of Immigration Review is the Department of Justice branch that oversees immigration courts.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Armed security guards at the Concord courthouse ask every person if they are carrying weapons or explosives and watch as each person turns off their cell phone.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Coffee is not allowed at the Concord courthouse, and only water in a transparent bottle is permitted.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Judah Lakin is an immigration attorney based in Oakland who also teaches at UC Berkeley School of Law.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The closure of the San Francisco court has made cases more time consuming because clients often travel hours to reach Concord on public transportation.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
A 10-minute hearing in Concord took Judah Lakin more than two hours of travel.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Mass firings have led to last-minute hearing cancellations in immigration courts.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Cases in immigration courts have been reset with little notice.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Immigration clients are often left in prolonged legal limbo, leaving them vulnerable to deportation.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
One of Judah Lakin's clients was provisionally granted asylum by a judge who was then fired before signing the decision.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
That client's case was transferred to a second judge who was also fired.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The client's case is now with a third judge and remains pending.
Judah Lakin, immigration attorney
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence85%
"I think that’s on purpose. That’s by design. It’s part of the strategy."
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
San Francisco immigration court was one of the first in the nation to hire judges with non-prosecutorial backgrounds, many of whom had previous experience working with immigrants at nonprofits or defending them in court.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Dana Leigh Marks is a former San Francisco immigration judge who retired in 2021 after 35 years on the bench and was among the first judges in the nation to be hired from private practice.
Dana Leigh Marks
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence85%
"It’s all a part of big ways and little ways that the Trump administration is trying to get non-citizens out of the country."
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Jeremiah Johnson was an immigration judge in San Francisco until he was fired in November and is now executive vice president of the National Association of Immigration Judges.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Jeremiah Johnson was appointed as an immigration judge during the first Trump administration.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Jeremiah Johnson granted asylum in 89% of the cases he heard.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Over eight years, about 10 of Jeremiah Johnson's cases were appealed by the Department of Homeland Security, and very few were sent back for further hearings by the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Unlike federal courts where judges have lifetime tenure and strict rules of procedure, the Justice Department runs immigration courts and the attorney general can fire judges with fewer constraints.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
There were 754 immigration judges across the country at the start of President Trump’s second term and now there are about 600, including some temporary judges.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Widespread courthouse arrests of immigrants have caused hundreds of people not to show up for hearings, leading to deportation orders in absentia.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence99%
Nidaa Pervaiz is an immigration attorney based in Oakland who came to the Concord court to represent a client from Nepal.
Nidaa Pervaiz, immigration attorney
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Nidaa Pervaiz said she prefers the Concord courthouse because it is closer to her home.
Nidaa Pervaiz, immigration attorney
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Nidaa Pervaiz said that fewer judges lead to fewer hearings and more delays for her clients, whose paperwork can expire before they appear before a judge.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.