Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence80%
The Trump administration is pressuring the United Nations and the international aid sector to adopt trade-focused policies to benefit US firms under threat of further budget cuts.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
The Trump administration fired nearly all of USAID’s 16,000 employees when it dismantled the agency last year.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
An estimated 280,000 contractors, partners, and local hires worldwide lost their jobs following the dismantling of USAID.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence80%
The Trump administration has largely suspended support for the World Health Organization, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence80%
Last week the Trump administration unveiled a “trade over aid” initiative at the United Nations.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence80%
The “trade over aid” initiative outlined a shift away from donor-focused development assistance toward greater private investment.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
Two US diplomatic notes circulated in Geneva and New York indicated that the US was willing to use the threat of more budget cuts to the international community to advance its agenda.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence80%
One diplomatic note said the US would only pay “a significant portion” of its UN dues if the United Nations implemented reforms including overhauling its pension scheme and cutting travel costs.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence80%
The note also said the US would only make an additional payment to UN peacekeeping budgets in return for a 10 percent reduction in peacekeeping missions.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
Oxfam America estimated at least 23 million children could lose access to education due to the closure of USAID.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
Oxfam America estimated that as many as 95 million people would lose access to basic healthcare due to the closure of USAID.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
Oxfam America estimated there could be more than 3 million preventable deaths per year as a result of the closure of USAID.
António Guterres, United Nations Secretary-General
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
UN Secretary-General António Guterres said last week that the funds the US owes were “non-negotiable”.
António Guterres, United Nations Secretary-General
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Earlier this year António Guterres warned that the United Nations faced “imminent financial collapse” due to unpaid fees most owed by the US.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
The UNHCR reduced its staff by 30% last year.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
The UNHCR needs an additional $61 million to support 600,000 people over the next three months.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
The UNHCR said its operations are “dramatically underfunded”, particularly in Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Afghanistan.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
“The drop in global humanitarian funding is having a major impact on humanitarian actors at the very moment as needs are rising sharply,” the UNHCR said.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
The UNHCR’s campaign to raise $23 billion to support 87 million people worldwide this year is only one-third funded.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
The United Nations World Food Programme estimates that nearly 45 million more people could face acute hunger if the war does not end by the middle of the year and if oil prices stay above $100 a barrel.
Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
In February at a security conference in Munich, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticized the United Nations for having “virtually no role” in resolving conflicts and called for significant reforms.
Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence80%
In March, Marco Rubio directed US diplomats to deliver a call to action to high-level foreign officials to sign on with their support for “trade over aid”.
Mike Waltz, US Ambassador
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
US Ambassador Mike Waltz said the “trade over aid” initiative did not mean the United States was walking away from international aid but instead meant shifting the old ways of doing business.
Mike Waltz, US Ambassador
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
“What you’ll typically hear is that the United States is walking away from aid, or are all the United States is walking away from the UN, it’s turning its back on the world. And I can tell you that couldn’t be further from the truth,” Waltz said at a launch event for the trade over aid initiative.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence80%
Representatives of US corporations including Walmart, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Palantir attended the launch event for the “trade over aid” initiative.
Mike Waltz, US Ambassador
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Mike Waltz said, “Free-market principles remain the best proven path to lasting prosperity, with better and more permanent results than any of the alternatives.”
Amrita Saha, researcher
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Amrita Saha said, “The power of international trade to create benefits from increased competition, more variety, higher productivity, and increases in GDP is well established.”
Amrita Saha, researcher
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Amrita Saha said, “Trade creates both winners and losers, and the benefits are often unevenly distributed across countries, regions, sectors, and social groups. If trade dominates the development agenda without complementary policies and support, the result will be highly uneven gains and the reinforced inequalities that risk the future of global trade cooperation.”
Amrita Saha, researcher
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Amrita Saha said, “Trade cannot operate as disjoint with broader development goals.”
Thomas Weiss, scholar of international relations and global governance
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Thomas Weiss said, “The irony of this stance is that the birth of the Group of 77 (G77) was at the plenary sessions for the United Nations conference on trade and development (formerly UNCTAD) in 1962 and the party line at that time was we want trade, not aid.”
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
In 1964, the 77 developing nations of the Group of 77 signed a declaration to promote collective economic interests.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
The formation of OPEC in 1960 and the declaration by the Group of 77 put more power in the hands of developing countries until the 1980s.
Thomas Weiss, scholar of international relations and global governance
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Thomas Weiss said, “This is a very complicated history.”
Thomas Weiss, scholar of international relations and global governance
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence80%
Thomas Weiss said, “Mainly, I think, it’s a justification to explain eliminating or cutting back USAID and every form of assistance, whether its humanitarian or development assistance, and many European countries have followed the US.”
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.