Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence95%
Kentucky's Republican-led General Assembly overrode Governor Andy Beshear's veto of a law that could shield Bayer from state lawsuits alleging it failed to warn customers that its Roundup weedkiller could cause cancer.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence95%
Bayer has asked a Missouri court to approve a $7.25 billion settlement to resolve tens of thousands of claims alleging its Roundup weedkiller caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Monsanto introduced Roundup weedkiller in 1974 with glyphosate as its active ingredient.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Roundup became one of the most commonly used herbicides in agriculture.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Roundup is designed for use with genetically modified seeds that resist glyphosate, enabling farmers to reduce tillage while controlling weeds.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018, adding Roundup to its product portfolio.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Approximately 200,000 claims alleging that glyphosate causes non-Hodgkin lymphoma have been filed against Bayer.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Bayer disputes assertions that glyphosate causes cancer.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Bayer has said legal costs from Roundup litigation threaten its ability to continue selling glyphosate-based products in U.S. agricultural markets.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans when used as directed.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence95%
The federally approved label for Roundup includes no warning of cancer.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
At the heart of most lawsuits is the claim that Roundup's manufacturer failed to warn customers of Roundup's potential cancer risk.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
Bayer partnered with Modern Ag Alliance, a coalition of agricultural organizations, to back bills in multiple states declaring that a federally approved pesticide label satisfies any duty under state law to warn customers.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
North Dakota and Georgia became the first states to enact laws last year providing legal shields based on federally approved pesticide labeling.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
Kentucky became the third state to enact a similar legal shield when lawmakers overrode the governor's veto.
Elizabeth Burns-Thompson, executive director of Modern Ag Alliance
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence95%
Elizabeth Burns-Thompson, executive director of Modern Ag Alliance, said "Farmers need clear, consistent rules to plan for the future and keep their operations profitable."
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
A Missouri jury awarded $1.25 million to a man who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma after spraying Roundup on a community garden in St. Louis and held Monsanto liable for failing to warn of the risk.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Bayer contends that federal pesticide laws preempt state failure-to-warn claims because states cannot require additional labeling beyond federally approved labels.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The Trump administration has sided with Bayer, reversing the position of the Biden administration, in supporting federal preemption of state failure-to-warn claims.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
Approximately 30 legal briefs have been filed by agricultural groups, business associations, health care organizations, plaintiffs' attorneys and state elected officials urging the Supreme Court to rule either for or against Bayer's argument for federal legal protection.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
Former EPA officials filed a court brief arguing that the absence of a cancer warning on Roundup labels does not preempt failure-to-warn lawsuits.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence90%
A St. Louis Circuit Court judge gave preliminary approval last month to a proposed settlement to resolve most pending and future failure-to-warn claims involving Roundup.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The proposed settlement calls for Bayer to make annual payments into a special fund for up to 21 years, totaling up to $7.25 billion.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
People can opt out of the proposed settlement by June 4.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Under the proposed settlement, an agricultural, industrial or turf worker exposed extensively to Roundup and diagnosed with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma before age 60 would receive an average of $165,000.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Under the proposed settlement, people diagnosed at age 78 or older would receive an average of $10,000.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The settlement would guarantee payments to claimants even if the Supreme Court rules in Bayer's favor.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Bayer would be protected from potentially larger costs under the settlement if the Supreme Court rules against it.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
Senator Cory Booker filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court backing cancer patients in a case over Roundup weedkiller liability.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The brief supports the plaintiff in Monsanto Company v. John L. Durnell who alleges Monsanto failed to warn consumers about cancer risks from Roundup.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
The case Monsanto Company v. John L. Durnell centers on whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act preempts state-level failure-to-warn claims against Monsanto.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence80%
If the Supreme Court rules in Monsanto's favor, it could significantly limit lawsuits alleging glyphosate exposure caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma; a ruling against Monsanto would allow those cases to proceed through state courts.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Bayer has paid more than $10 billion to resolve earlier Roundup-related claims.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Monsanto denies any link between glyphosate and cancer and states that hundreds of studies have established glyphosate is safe.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Booker has introduced legislation to amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, including a bill to allow people harmed by pesticides to sue in federal court and a bill to restrict the use of certain harmful chemicals.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
The Justice Department filed a brief with the Supreme Court supporting Monsanto's argument that federal pesticide law preempts state-level failure-to-warn claims.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence90%
Monsanto stated that federal law creates a uniform, nationwide framework for pesticide labeling and that allowing state lawsuits to proceed would create conflicting standards.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
President Donald Trump has directed federal agencies to boost production of glyphosate, calling it critical to national security and the U.S. food supply.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence90%
In February, Booker condemned an executive order directing federal agencies to boost glyphosate production as lawsuits over its safety continued.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.