Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The report 'Fertility, Embryo Research and Genome Editing: Public Attitudes in Europe' was launched during the 42nd Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The report 'Fertility, Embryo Research and Genome Editing: Public Attitudes in Europe' was commissioned by the charity Progress Educational Trust.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The report 'Fertility, Embryo Research and Genome Editing: Public Attitudes in Europe' was supported by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The report 'Fertility, Embryo Research and Genome Editing: Public Attitudes in Europe' was conducted by Ipsos.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The survey explored public attitudes towards fertility treatment, embryo research, genome editing, surrogacy and related topics across the UK, Netherlands, Spain and Italy.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The survey included 8,688 participants aged 16–75 years.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The survey included more than 2,000 respondents in each of the four countries.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Survey samples were designed to be representative of national populations according to age, gender, region and working status.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Across all four countries, a majority of respondents supported state-funded fertility treatment for people experiencing infertility and wishing to conceive.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Support for state-funded fertility treatment ranged from 54% in the Netherlands to 64% in Italy.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The survey found public backing for the use of human embryos in research to better understand and develop treatments for congenital diseases.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Support for the use of human embryos in research ranged from 41% in Italy to 48% in the Netherlands and Spain.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Support for the use of human embryos in research exceeded opposition in all four countries surveyed.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Research uses of human embryos are currently prohibited in Italy.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Support for genome editing to eliminate severe or life-threatening conditions in embryos intended for pregnancy ranged from 46% in Italy to 55% in the Netherlands.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
A majority of respondents in the UK, Netherlands and Spain supported using genome editing to eliminate severe or life-threatening conditions in embryos intended for pregnancy.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Using genome editing to eliminate severe or life-threatening conditions in embryos intended for pregnancy is not currently permitted in the UK, Netherlands, Spain or Italy.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Professor Karen Sermon is the Immediate Past Chair of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Karen Sermon, Immediate Past Chair of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
"Reproductive medicine and embryo research are advancing rapidly, and these findings show the importance of understanding how the public views those developments."
Karen Sermon, Immediate Past Chair of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
"It is particularly striking that support for some applications extends beyond what is currently permitted in certain countries."
Karen Sermon, Immediate Past Chair of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
"As science advances, it is essential that public awareness keeps pace, so that decisions about future treatments are informed by both evidence and societal values."
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Among respondents who supported, or neither supported nor opposed, the use of human embryos in research, the most common view was that the current 14-day limit on embryo research is 'about right'.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
27% of respondents asked about the 14-day limit said they did not know whether it was too long, too short or about right.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Respondents were asked what circumstances, if any, might justify extending the 14-day limit to 28 days.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Among those who supported, or neither supported nor opposed, embryo research, the most popular justification for extending the 14-day limit was finding new treatments for congenital diseases.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Generational differences in attitudes were observed across several topics explored in the survey, including sex selection, fertility treatment access and embryo research.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Across the survey as a whole, only a small proportion of respondents selected 'Prefer not to answer'.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Younger respondents in all four countries were more likely than older respondents to say that sex selection should be permitted.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
In each of the four countries, the number of respondents saying that surrogacy should be permitted exceeds the number who say that surrogacy should be prohibited.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Sarah Norcross is the Director of the Progress Educational Trust.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.