Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
For more than 40 years, oil companies have funded research at universities into climate change solutions that do not require the public to stop using oil and gas.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Carbon capture and storage is a favored solution among oil company-funded researchers.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
In 2008, the International Energy Agency projected that 1.6 billion tons of CO2 per year would need to be buried by 2025 to stave off dangerous levels of warming.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Global permanent carbon dioxide burial is currently less than the annual emissions of a single large power plant.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Enhanced oil recovery involves pumping CO2 into the ground to help extract oil.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Enhanced oil recovery is not designed to function the same way as carbon capture and storage for climate mitigation.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Enhanced oil recovery is not monitored as stringently as carbon capture and storage for climate mitigation.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Models used in the latest United Nations assessment presume carbon capture and storage technology succeeds.
International Energy Agency representatives
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
International Energy Agency representatives state their projections reflect what is required to achieve goals of averting extreme warming.
United Nations modelers
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
United Nations modelers state their projections reflect what is required to achieve goals of averting extreme warming.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
One method of carbon capture involves trapping CO2 from smoke stacks.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
One method of carbon capture involves absorbing CO2 from the air with fast-growing grasses or trees, then capturing it from those plants when they are burned for fuel.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
One method of carbon capture involves scrubbing CO2 from the air, often using giant fans.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Captured CO2 is pumped into porous rock deep beneath the earth’s surface.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
United Nations analysis suggests countries must inject 6 billion tons of CO2 underground each year by the middle of the century.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Implementing carbon capture at industrial facilities would require adding equipment to each facility, in some cases doubling its land footprint.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Devoting land to growing carbon-absorbing plants would require about 768,000 square miles worldwide.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
768,000 square miles is an area roughly the size of Mexico.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The United States would need to build more than 68,000 miles of new pipelines in a little more than two decades to move captured CO2.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
68,000 miles is more than double the distance to fly around the earth.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
68,000 miles is longer than the United States' entire interstate highway system.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Global carbon capture pipelines could tally in the hundreds of thousands of miles.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
At least 85 specially built tankers would be needed to move high-pressured CO2 gas across oceans.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
As of April, there were only three ships in the world equipped to move high-pressured CO2 gas.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Today, 12 large-scale geologic reservoirs have attempted to permanently store CO2 pollution.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
More than 2,000 reservoirs of the size of current large-scale projects would be needed for carbon capture and storage to work at the scale envisioned.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Each new geological storage reservoir requires years of study and engineering before it can be used.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Achieving the necessary number of reservoirs would require opening a new geological waste site somewhere on the planet every four days for the next 25 years.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Every carbon storage site would need constant monitoring for decades to ensure CO2 does not leak.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Implementing carbon capture and storage at scale would cost tens of trillions of dollars.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
U.S. taxpayers currently pay oil and gas companies $85 for every metric ton of CO2 they put underground.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
At the current U.S. rate, the world could spend half a trillion dollars each year on carbon capture and storage by 2050.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Since 1996, 12 large-scale geological storage projects have opened.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Since 1996, plans for another 12 large-scale geological storage projects have been scrapped.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Carbon capture and storage sites in Norway, Algeria, Australia, and the U.S. have experienced operational problems.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Some rock layers can hold far less CO2 than experts have estimated.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Finicky pipes and injection systems in carbon capture projects can get clogged or break down.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The rock that seals CO2 in place can crack, risking a leak.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
In one instance, injected CO2 caused the ground above it to bulge.
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
In one instance, CO2 escaped from an old oil industry well nearby.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Thorough, long-term monitoring of carbon storage sites can be expensive.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Without monitoring, leaks from carbon storage sites could be missed.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Modelers who overestimated the potential of geological carbon storage repeatedly underestimated solar power.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Solar power is one of the energy technologies that would allow more oil to remain in the ground.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Projections for carbon capture and storage deployment are from the International Energy Agency’s Energy Technology Perspectives and World Energy Outlook reports.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.