Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Trials of US military personnel are usually held on military premises.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Judges, prosecutors, and defence lawyers in US military trials are legally trained and employed by the military.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Juries in US military trials consist of members of the armed forces.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
There are more than 12,000 US personnel stationed on at least 15 US military bases and facilities in the UK.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
With the exception of Lossiemouth in Scotland, all US military bases in the UK are in England.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
US military personnel can sometimes bypass the British legal system when alleged offences took place while they were off duty.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Convictions of US service members in the UK have included sexual assaults, paedophilia, indecent exposure, violent attacks, drink-driving, speeding, and driving an uninsured car.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
A significant number of crimes committed by US military personnel in the UK have involved British victims and were committed outside US military bases.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Many perpetrators were prosecuted in American military courts within US bases.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Courts martial hearings are held behind heavily guarded perimeter fences.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The public are not able to freely walk into a court martial and listen to proceedings.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
US military commanders have the ability to convene a hearing to try military personnel accused of wrongdoing.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The conduct of US forces is governed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The Uniform Code of Military Justice covers offences such as disobeying orders, desertion, war crimes, taking drugs while on duty, sexual violence, and paedophilia.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The Uniform Code of Military Justice covers perceived moral transgressions such as infidelity toward a partner, with a maximum punishment of a year in a military jail.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The Uniform Code of Military Justice covers gambling with lower ranks, which can result in imprisonment for three months.
US air force spokesperson
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
A US air force spokesperson said its proceedings “are fair, transparent and thorough”.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The US has had military bases in Britain since the second world war.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The terms under which US military bases operate in the UK are detailed in a Status of Forces agreement struck with the British government in 1951.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 1951 Status of Forces agreement stipulates that the US government prosecutes its own military personnel if offences were committed while on duty.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 1951 Status of Forces agreement stipulates that the US government prosecutes its own military personnel if offences were committed against another member of the US armed forces, its property, or a dependant.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
In cases not covered by specific stipulations, the British police technically have the first option on whether to launch a prosecution of American military personnel.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The 1951 Status of Forces agreement stipulates that Americans can ask police or prosecutors to relinquish a case.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The British are required to give “sympathetic” consideration to requests to relinquish a case, but can refuse.
US air force expert
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
A US air force expert in the US military justice system said the UK often handed cases over to the US.
US air force expert
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
A US air force expert in the US military justice system said the Americans would defer if the British insisted on prosecuting a case.
US air force expert
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
A US air force expert in the US military justice system said, “Oftentimes the UK will turn it back over to the US military and allow us to prosecute it.”
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The Pentagon argues that prosecuting its own military personnel is a more effective way of maintaining discipline.
US air force expert
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
A US air force expert said, “It’s very important to our commanders to be able to have consistent, standardised punishments and systems for our troops.”
US air force expert
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
A US air force expert said commanders “want to send a deterrent message.”
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
British police and prosecutors do not keep statistics on refusals to let the US prosecute.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Mikayla Hayes is an American mechanic based at the Lakenheath airbase.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
In August 2022, Mikayla Hayes was driving from the Lakenheath airbase to her home in Downham Market, Norfolk.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
In August 2022, Mikayla Hayes hit a motorbike driven by Matthew Day, a 33-year-old Briton.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Matthew Day died after the collision with Mikayla Hayes.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence100%
The US military sought to take over the investigation into Mikayla Hayes, arguing that Norfolk police had no authority to arrest her.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence100%
The US served a formal certificate on British authorities to assert that Mikayla Hayes should be tried in a court martial.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The Crown Prosecution Service brought a successful legal challenge to have the certificate quashed.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Mikayla Hayes was prosecuted at Norwich crown court.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
Mikayla Hayes was acquitted of causing death by careless driving.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.