Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
The High Court of Justice heard arguments against the law changing the composition and voting rules of the Judicial Selection Committee on Sunday.
Relevance: primary · Type: event
Confidence100%
An expanded bench of all 11 sitting Supreme Court justices participated in the hearing.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The hearing concerns six consolidated petitions seeking to strike down the amendment to Basic Law: The Judiciary and the Courts Law.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The Knesset passed the amendment to Basic Law: The Judiciary and the Courts Law in March 2025.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The amendment is due to take effect only in the next Knesset.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence100%
The court issued a conditional order shifting the burden to the Knesset and government to explain why the law should remain in force.
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence100%
Petitioners and Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara argue the amendment severely harms judicial independence and the separation of powers.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
The previous nine-member Judicial Selection Committee included three Supreme Court justices, two Israel Bar Association representatives, two ministers including the justice minister, and two MKs.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The new law removes the Israel Bar Association representatives from the Judicial Selection Committee.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
The new law replaces the Israel Bar Association representatives with two public representatives who are lawyers qualified to serve on the Supreme Court.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
One new public representative is selected by the coalition and one by the opposition.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Petitioners state the new committee structure results in an effective political majority of six members compared with three judges.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Under the new law, Supreme Court appointments no longer require the previous seven-member supermajority.
Relevance: primary · Type: background
Confidence100%
Under the new law, appointments can be made with agreement between coalition and opposition representatives without the support of any judges on the committee.
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Supreme Court President Isaac Amit stated the legislation made a significant change to the way judges are selected after decades under the previous arrangement.
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: primary · Type: action
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit urged the parties to focus on whether the amendment violates the core democratic principle of an independent judiciary.
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit said, "Within a year of the next Knesset being elected, two judges could be selected with ‘chosen by the coalition’ and ‘chosen by the opposition’ written on their foreheads."
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit said, "Over 15 years, the benches of the Supreme Court will be filled by judges selected only by political actors."
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit asked, "Will there be a political chip implanted in every judge who is selected?"
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit asked, "Does that not harm the democratic system Israel has known for nearly 80 years?"
Dafna Barak-Erez, Justice
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Justice Dafna Barak-Erez said the law was already influencing the current situation before it enters into force.
Dafna Barak-Erez, Justice
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Dafna Barak-Erez said, "Anyone with eyes in their head can understand: let us wait a little longer, in a few months the law will come into force, so why appoint Supreme Court justices now?"
Dafna Barak-Erez, Justice
Relevance: primary · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Dafna Barak-Erez said, "This is a reality that is already being shaped today."
Alex Stein, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Justice Alex Stein asked what a district court judge seeking promotion to the Supreme Court would have to do in 10 years.
Alex Stein, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Alex Stein said, "Find favor in the eyes of politicians, write judgments that politicians like."
Yechiel Kasher, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Justice Yechiel Kasher asked what the chances are of a highly qualified district court judge with no identifiable political affiliation being selected under the new model.
Yechiel Kasher, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Yechiel Kasher said, "The answer is zero."
Yael Willner, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Justice Yael Willner warned that the deadlock-breaking mechanism could result in Supreme Court judges being selected without a vote of the full committee.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Under the deadlock-breaking mechanism, coalition and opposition representatives would each submit candidates after a prolonged failure to appoint Supreme Court justices.
Yitzhak Bart, Attorney
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Attorney Yitzhak Bart argued that the reform followed longstanding criticism that elected officials lacked sufficient influence over judicial appointments.
Relevance: supporting · Type: background
Confidence100%
Yitzhak Bart represents the Knesset’s legal counsel.
Dafna Barak-Erez, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Dafna Barak-Erez said, "This is a radical solution."
Ofer Grosskopf, Justice
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Justice Ofer Grosskopf questioned why allegations of wrongdoing involving the Bar Association should lead to removing its representatives from the committee.
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit said former Bar Association head Efi Nave’s influence in the committee had depended on political actors.
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit said, "Someone else could reach the opposite conclusion, that perhaps the two politicians should be removed from the committee."
Yaakov Ben-Shemesh, Government Representative
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Dr. Yaakov Ben-Shemesh argued that political participation in judicial appointments does not inherently undermine professionalism or judicial independence.
Yaakov Ben-Shemesh, Government Representative
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Yaakov Ben-Shemesh said politicians are elected public representatives.
Yaakov Ben-Shemesh, Government Representative
Relevance: supporting · Type: quote
Confidence100%
Yaakov Ben-Shemesh said it should not be assumed politicians lack an interest in appointing qualified judges.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
The Knesset and government argued that the petitions are premature because the amendment will apply only from the next Knesset.
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
The Knesset and government argued that the court lacks authority to invalidate a Basic Law.
Gali Baharav-Miara, Attorney-General
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara argued that the amendment reverses the longstanding balance between professional and political members of the committee.
Gali Baharav-Miara, Attorney-General
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Gali Baharav-Miara argued the amendment creates incentives that could influence both judicial candidates and sitting judges.
Tally Gotliv, Likud MK
Relevance: supporting · Type: event
Confidence100%
Likud MK Tally Gotliv interrupted the hearing from the audience.
Isaac Amit, Supreme Court President
Relevance: supporting · Type: action
Confidence100%
Isaac Amit ordered court security to remove Tally Gotliv from the hall after repeated warnings.
forum Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.